Skip to main content
Grounds for Divorce u/s 13 of Hindu Marraige Act

Section 13. Divorce- 

(1) (Bigamy)Any marriage solemnized, whether before or after the commencement of the Act, may, on a petition presented by either the husband or the wife, be dissolved by a decree of divorce on the ground that the other party- 

(i) (Adeltery) has, after the solemnization of the marriage had voluntary sexual intercourse with any person other than his or her spouse; or 
(ia) (Cruelty) has, after the solemnization of the marriage, treated the petitioner with cruelty; or 
(ib) (Desersion) has deserted the petitioner for a continuous period of not less than two years immediately preceding the presentation of the petition; or 

ii) (Conversion) has ceased to be a Hindu by conversion to another religion ; or 

iii) (Unsoundess of Mind) has been incurably of unsound mind, or has suffering continuously or intermittently from mental disorder of such a kind and to such an extent that the petitioner cannot reasonably be expected to live with the respondent. Explanation- In this clause- (a) the expression "mental disorder" means mental illness, arrested or incomplete development of mind, psychopathic disorder or any other disorder or disability of mind and include schizophrenia; (b) the expression "psychopathic disorder" means a persistent disorder or disability of mind (whether or not including sub-normality of intelligence) which results in abnormally aggressive or seriously irresponsible conduct on the part of the other party and whether or not it requires or is susceptible to medical treatment; or 

(iv) (Leprosy) has been suffering from a virulent and incurable form of leprosy; or 

(v) (Veneral Disease) has been suffering from veneral disease in a communicable form; or 

(vi) (Change of Religion) has renounced the world by entering any religious order; or 

(vii) (Not heard for 7 years) has not been heard of as being alive for a period of seven years or more by those persons who would naturally have heard of it, had that party been alive; 

Explanation.- In this sub-section, the expression "desertion" means the desertion of the petitioner by the other party to the marriage without reasonable cause and without the consent or against the wish of such party, and includes the willful neglect of the petitioner by the other party to the marriage, and its grammatical variations and cognate expression shall be construed accordingly. 

(1-A) Either party to a marriage, whether solemnized before or after the commencement of this Act, may also present a petition for the dissolution of the marriage by a decree of divorce on the ground- 

(i) that there has been no resumption of cohabitation as between the parties to the marriage for a period of one year or upwards after the passing of a decree for judicial separation in a proceeding to which they were parties; or 

(ii) that there has been no restitution of conjugal rights as between the parties to the marriage for a period of one year or upward after the passing of a decree of restitution of conjugal rights in a proceeding to which they were parties. 

(2) (Grounds for Wife) A wife may also present a petition for the dissolution of her marriage by a decree of divorce on the ground- 
(i) in the case of any marriage solemnized before the commencement of this Act, that the husband had married again before the commencement or that any other wife of the husband married before such commencement was alive at the time of the solemnization of the marriage of the petitioner: Provided that in either case the other wife is alive at the time of the presentation of the petition; 
(ii) that the husband has, since the solemnization of the marriage, been guilty of rape, sodomy or bestiality; or 
(iii) that in a suit under Section 18 of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, (78 of 1956), or in a proceeding under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, (Act 2 of 1974) or under corresponding Section 488 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, (5 of 1898), a decree or order, as the case may be, has been passed against the husband awarding maintenance to the wife notwithstanding that she was living apart and that since the passing of such decree or order, cohabitation between the parties has not been resumed for one year or upwards;or 
(iv) that her marriage (whether consummated or not) was solemnized before she attained the age of fifteen years and she has repudiated the marriage after attaining that age but before attaining the age of eighteen years. Explanation.- This clause applies whether the marriage was solemnized before or after the commencement of the Marriage Law (Amendment) Act, 1976.

 13-A. Alternate Relief in Divorce Proceedings.- If any proceeding under this Act, on a petition for dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce, except in so far as the petition is founded on the grounds mentioned in clauses (ii), (vi) and (vii) of sub-section (1) of Section 13, the court may, if it considers it just so to do having regard to the circumstances of the case, pass instead a decree for judicial separation.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ITS NOT OVERACTING TO PREPARE FOR CORONA VIRUS

ITS NOT OVERACTING TO PREPARE FOR CORONA VIRUS SOURCE : VOX (kelsey piper) The novel coronavirus is continuing its spread in the United States.   Over the weekend, the number of people affected   in the US jumped from  60 to 86,  with cases in New York, Florida, and  Rhode Island  and 13 confirmed cases in Washington state (including the first two  US fatalities ). That’s despite  serious limitations on testing , which means many US cases may be undiscovered. Meanwhile, the World Health Organization  raised its risk assessment worldwide to the highest level , as more countries —  now nearly 50 — reported cases . The recent developments in the US suggest that what the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) warned us about is already happening: that we are now seeing  community spread , meaning novel coronavirus cases that have no links to overseas travel or to other known cases. These developments have many Amer...

WhatsApp cannot be a public place if messages are exchanged on personal accounts of two persons

The Bombay High Court has recently pass order in writ petition   Nivrutti s/o Hariram Gaikwad vs Mrs. Pooja Nkivrutti Gaikwad and it has held that " WhatsApp cannot be a public place if messages are exchanged on personal accounts of two persons" . If these messages had been posted on personel account of whatsapp". and hence it is not offence u/s 294 of Indian Penal Code 

Intellectual Property: The dominant force in economic development

Intellectual Property: The dominant force in economic development Intellectual property (IP) is the term that describes the ideas, inventions, technologies, artworks, music and literature, that are intangible when first created, but become valuable in tangible form as products. Intellectual properties are the creations of the mind: inventions, literary and artistic works, and the symbols, names, and designs used in commerce. The rationale for the establishment of a legal framework on IPRs is that it is a signal to society that creative and inventive ideas will be rewarded. IP system is being integrated into the knowledge economy, and posing interesting challenges to industry, government policy-makers, scholars, and researchers in both developed and developing countries. Character of IPRIntellectual property rights as a collective term includes the following independent IP rights which can be collectively used for protecting different aspects of an inventive work for multiple protection...