Skip to main content

WhatsApp cannot be a public place if messages are exchanged on personal accounts of two persons

The Bombay High Court has recently pass order in writ petition  Nivrutti s/o Hariram Gaikwad vs Mrs. Pooja Nkivrutti Gaikwad and it has held that "WhatsApp cannot be a public place if messages are exchanged on personal accounts of two persons". If these messages had been posted on personel account of whatsapp". and hence it is not offence u/s 294 of Indian Penal Code 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Bail and Arrest

Bail and Arrest The dictionary meaning of bail is  the temporary release of an accused person awaiting trial, sometimes on condition that a sum of money is lodged to guarantee their appearance in court. The provisions bail mentioned in  Section 436 to 439 of The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 436. In what cases bail to be taken. (1)  When any person other than a person accused of a non- bailable offence is arrested or detained without warrant by an officer in charge of a police station, or appears or is brought before a Court, and is prepared at any time while in the custody of such officer or at any stage of the proceeding before such Court to give bail, such person shall be released on bail: Provided that such officer or Court, if he or it thinks fit, may, instead of taking bail from such person, discharge him on his executing a bond without sureties for his appearance as hereinafter provided: Provided further that nothing in this section shall be deemed to affe
Grounds for Divorce u/s 13 of Hindu Marraige Act Section 13. Divorce-  (1)  (Bigamy) Any marriage solemnized, whether before or after the commencement of the Act, may, on a petition presented by either the husband or the wife, be dissolved by a decree of divorce on the ground that the other party-  (i) (Adeltery) has, after the solemnization of the marriage had voluntary sexual intercourse with any person other than his or her spouse; or  (ia) (Cruelty) has, after the solemnization of the marriage, treated the petitioner with cruelty; or  (ib) (Desersion) has deserted the petitioner for a continuous period of not less than two years immediately preceding the presentation of the petition; or  ii) (Conversion) has ceased to be a Hindu by conversion to another religion ; or  iii) (Unsoundess of Mind) has been incurably of unsound mind, or has suffering continuously or intermittently from mental disorder of such a kind and to such an extent that the petiti

Can the section 304-A of I.P.C. be a license to kill?

The original Indian Penal Code, 1860 had no provision providing punishment for causing death by negligence. Section 304-A was inserted in the Code in 1870 by the Indian Penal Code (Amendment) Act, 1870. This section did not create a new offence but was directed towards the offences which fall outside the range of section 299 and 300 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (herein after referred as I.P.C.) when neither intention nor knowledge to cause death is present. The said section reads as follows:304A. Causing death by negligence.--Whoever causes the death of any person by doing any rash or negligent act not amounting to culpable homicide shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both. The provisions of this section apply to cases where there is no intention to cause death, and no knowledge that the act done in all probability would cause death. The Supreme Court has clarified that the section 304-A of I.P.C. i